The Tone Curve is a long-standing staple in not only Lightroom but many other post-processing software offerings. This is the familiar face in the DNG Profile Editor. Base your custom camera profile on existing profiles of your particular camera by using the “Base Profile” drop-down. This is all birthed from the embedded profiles (or downloaded) from the camera used to make the image being used as a reference. You can also control the temperature of the color table in degrees Kelvin just as you would in Lightroom. The color table is just the color wheel and it is laid out for you to pick colors from your image (more on this later) to adjust their hue and saturation as well as lightness. I’ll briefly explain what each one of them does. As you’ll notice there are a number of tabs at the top. This is where you will make your custom camera profiles. Oh, and did I mention the software is available absolutely FREE from Adobe? If you want to follow along with me then click one of the links below to download the latest build of the DNG Profile Editor from Adobe.įinding your way around the DNG Profile Editor is alarmingly straightforward because the majority of the controls are nestled on the right-hand side of the window. I won’t go too far into explaining the usefulness of camera profiles here, but there is an excellent article by Andrew Gibson here on dPS if you want to learn more about camera calibration and profiles in Lightroom.įor the purposes of this article, I will focus on how you can make your very own custom camera profiles using Adobe’s little secret, the DNG Profile Editor. What function do you ask? It allows you to create your own custom camera profiles for use inside Lightroom’s Adobe Camera Raw.Ĭamera profiles are the silent weapon of post-processing but they don’t get a lot of press. Just kidding, it’s not very impressive but it serves to facilitate a very useful function. Enough of introducing it, this is the DNG Profile Editor in all its glory: Think of the DNG Profile Editor as a way to make presets that are something more just your run of the mill develop preset. Not only that, it is extremely useful if you like being a complete photography nerd and you enjoy creating your own unique flavor of processing. It’s a little bit of an Adobe secret.ĭespite being a relatively unknown piece of software the DNG Profile Editor (no easy way to abbreviate) is somewhat of a necessity when it comes to editing infrared images. (An IFD is an "image file directory", a subsection of a TIFF.Have you ever heard of Adobe’s DNG Profile Editor? No? It’s okay if you haven’t because up until about a month ago I had no idea it even existed. Here's a summary of the representations stored in an Enhance DNG, as reported by Exiftool. Instead, we should opt for precision and say that the Enhance DNGs include the original raw mosaic data.ĭNGs, like TIFFs more generally, contain multiple representations of an image. Regardless, I think we should stop saying that Enhance DNGs "embed" the original raw, saving "embed" for the "Embed Original Raw File" option that includes the byte-for-byte copy of the original raw file. Or perhaps there's another reason for keeping the mosaic data in the DNGs. Perhaps most users would rather have Enhance DNGs 25% smaller and lose the ability to run Denoise on Raw Details DNGs. It makes the file 25% larger, but it does allow you to run Denoise on Raw Details DNGs. I don't know why Enhance DNGs contain the original raw's mosaic data. So in this sense, Enhance DNGs do not "embed" the original raw file+. But they don't include byte-for-byte copies of the original raw file.ĭNGs produced by LR's Convert Photo To DNG with the Embed Original Raw File option include not only the mosaic data converted to standard DNG representation, but also an exact copy of the original raw file, stored in the DNG:OriginalRawImage field. So in that sense, the Enhance DNGs do "embed" the raw data. But there's ambiguity (and confusion) in the term "embed".Įnhance DNGs include both the linear raw data produced by Super Resolution, Raw Details, and Noise Reduction and the original raw mosaic (color filter array) data, converted to standard DNG representation. When users ask why Enhance DNGs are so big, several experienced people in the forums are reporting that the Enhance DNGs "embed" the original raw. I drilled into some LR-produced DNGS using Exiftool, and I no longer think there's a bug in Adobe DNG Converter or in the Metadata panel.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |